The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Letters  |  Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Phillipe And Jorge  |  Talking Politics  |  The Editorial Page  |  This Just In

Inauguration daze

If a presidential speech is made outside of prime-time TV-viewing hours, does it make a sound?
By STEVEN STARK  |  January 19, 2009


For the next week, the press and pundits will talk all about the historical importance of Barack Obama's inaugural address. And, based on his past rhetorical performances, it should be a great one.

But, alas for him and for them, it doesn't really matter. Inaugural addresses are an anachronism. Yes, they once meant a lot. And many of our most-treasured political axioms derive from inaugural addresses. Franklin D. Roosevelt told the nation at his first inaugural that it had nothing to fear but fear itself. Abraham Lincoln, at his second, spoke of the coming post–Civil War healing that he hoped would display malice toward none and charity for all.

But those speeches were in the days before television, when Americans heard from their presidents much less frequently and regular presidential appearances hadn't become a kind of TV show in their own right.

In truth, it's been almost a half-century since anyone said anything memorable in an inaugural speech — John F. Kennedy with his "Ask not what your country can do for you" oration in 1961, right before TV became a dominant force in our national life. Perhaps recognizing the obsolete nature of the whole exercise since, even our greatest post-JFK rhetorical president, Ronald Reagan, never bothered to display his best stuff on January 20 — reserving it for other, more memorable occasions. Showing a true understanding of the media culture, the one memorable thing Reagan did do at inaugural time was to flip the coin from the Oval Office the night before his swearing-in (in 1985) to open that year's Super Bowl. How many more people watched the coin flip rather than the inaugural speech? Oh, only about 80 million or so.

The major problem with an inauguration speech, of course, is that it isn't delivered in prime time, so few actually hear it. If Obama really wanted his words to reach the masses — and give the nation a change they could believe in, if only because they'd actually experience it — he'd move his address to the evening (much like the World Series and so many other events have done), and then do his serious partying at the inaugural balls afterward.

But that isn't the only problem. The setting for the speech — on the steps of the US Capitol — is majestic, but it's also very cold and the elements are uncontrollable. There's a reason most TV shows are shot in California or in studios, and most Super Bowls are held in warm-weather locales or indoors.

That's why the State of the Union ranks as the more important occasion — with the ratings to prove it. It's held at 9 pm EST — prime time in most of the country. And its indoor, equally majestic setting is every bit as compelling as anything inauguration day has to offer.

The other problem for Obama next week is that no one single speech can be that important anymore. That's because Americans now see their president all the time, thanks to cable TV and Internet news, which broadcast around the clock.

Even formal addresses are delivered far more frequently than in the pre-TV past. Obama has already delivered one on the economy, and he has not even yet taken the office. He seems certain to hold regular press conferences. In fact, a counter-intuitive media critic might want to speculate on whether one real political danger to Obama is overexposure. There's something to be said for a little distance between the people and their president in terms of preserving some of the mystique of the office. It's worth remembering that, for all his vaunted communication skills on radio, FDR only gave 16 Fireside Chats during his first eight years in office – an average of only two a year.

Inauguration day is deservedly a national time of celebration and renewal, especially this year, when the populace is so desirous of change and in search of leadership. But in the long run, for better or worse, more people will probably remember what Michelle Obama wore to the inaugural balls than what her husband said some 12 hours earlier.

To read the "Presidential Tote Board" blog, go to Steven Stark can be reached at

  Topics: News Features , Barack Obama , U.S. Presidential Inauguration , Media ,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Re: Inauguration daze
Boy, did this article turn out to be a complete mis-read. People are talking about that address everywhere. Very powerful and a message the people needed to hear. It's okay not to be cynical all the time, you know...
By Car in Lincolnville on 01/21/2009 at 1:47:25

Today's Event Picks
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   REVENGE OF THE NERDS  |  January 21, 2009
    For the first time since JFK, 'the best and the brightest' are back in the White House. Will Ivy-League intellect be enough to set the country straight?
  •   INAUGURATION DAZE  |  January 19, 2009
    If a presidential speech is made outside of prime-time TV-viewing hours, does it make a sound?
  •   BHO'S NO FDR  |  December 31, 2008
    Nor should he aspire to be because, trite but true, things are very different now
  •   MONEY MATTERS  |  December 24, 2008
    Obama's victory was bought and paid for — with change
  •   LOU DOBBS IN 2012?  |  October 16, 2008
    As the GOP implodes, the financial crisis may present a white-hot moment for a third-party voice to enter the fray

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group