Healey's debate sleight-of-hand
Here's the explanation from Nate Little, a campaign spokesman for Kerry Healey, on why the Massachusetts lieutenant governor is taking a pass
on next month's live debate: "Two of the three Democrats won't even be
in the race after the primaries. We sent out a debate challenge last
week, for four debates between primary and election day. So once the
candidates for the final are established, we'll be happy to debate
anytime and anywhere."
I guess the idea is to let the Dems beat up on each other, instead of
ganging up on the LG. Still, you've got to wonder if Healey is making
the right choice here. Participating in pre-primary debates would
toughen her up for the general-election campaign, and let her hammer
home the differences between her and her opponents early and often. But
this just makes Healey look timid.
It also renders Healey's aforementioned debate challenge
wholly unimpressive. According to MassINC president Ian Bowles, the
various candidates were informed of the date of the live-broadcast
debate on April 7, and mailed written invitations on April 14. Healey
issued her challenge on Tuesday, April 25--which suggests it was simply
a bit of damage control aimed at making the LG's decision to abstain
from the May debate look a little less lame.
Mission not accomplished, I'd say.