The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures

Toxic talk: Hating Obama

Repugnant anti-Obama hate speech has dissipated for the moment. How likely is it to raise its ugly head again?
By ADAM REILLY  |  January 19, 2009


Speak no evil: Why tightening up on anti-Obama speech is a bad idea. By Adam Reilly.
During and just after the 2008 presidential campaign, the antipathy of right-wing pundits toward Barack Obama reached remarkable, often repugnant depths. Some examples: talk-radio hatemonger Michael Savage warned his listeners that Obama was "hand-picked by some very powerful forces . . . to drag this country into a hell it has not seen since the Civil War." Jay Severin, Savage's Boston-based comrade-in-arms, called on his listeners to "destroy" Obama before he causes "our doom as a nation." (Severin's caveat — that this be done legally — was undercut by his statement that "Obama is King George and we are the Minutemen." The Minutemen weren't big on legality.) And Fox News commentator Liz Trotta quipped, with a chuckle and a smile, that it would be nice to assassinate both Osama bin Laden and Obama. (Trotta later said she was "so sorry" for her comments, and chalked them up to the "very colorful political season.")

Immediately following Obama's victory, meanwhile, similarly vile manifestations of this same mindset popped up around the country. In Maine, a convenience store hosted a betting pool on when Obama would be assassinated, accompanied by a sign that read: "Let's hope someone wins." And a North Carolina State student wrote a disgusting proposal — "Let's shoot that nigger in the head" — inside that school's Free Expression Tunnel.

Where, exactly, did all this anti-Obama venom come from? The fact that Obama's father was black — and that, according to the prevailing conceptualization of race, this makes Obama our first black president — obviously played a role, be it overt or covert. So, too, did the fact that Obama's surname happens to rhyme with "Osama" — and that, according to various bogus conspiracy theories, he's a closet Muslim, and/or a closet Marxist, and/or a buddy of terrorists, and/or a non-citizen whose ascent to the presidency, according to the United States Constitution, is illegal.

Given the manifold wellsprings of dislike and distrust for Obama, it might have been inevitable that things got as ugly as they did. Still, what made this festering animus so dismaying — apart from what it revealed about the deep recesses of our political id — is that it jeopardized Obama's promise as a political unifier. Remember, Obama burst on the scene with his brilliant keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, in which he spoke of transcending the bitter divides of American politics and culture. But two months ago, the president-elect looked, if anything, like the second coming of Bill Clinton — a gifted politician who, as president, could whip Rush Limbaugh and co. into a frenzy and polarize the nation.

In recent weeks, though, there's been a distinct drop-off in repugnant anti-Obama invective — in the conservative press, among the general public, even among white-supremacists. Which raises the question: is extreme Obama-phobia already a thing of the past? Or, instead, is it just on hiatus — and poised to return with a vengeance once Obama actually starts governing?

The honeymooner
As director of the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Project, Mark Potok spends his days monitoring organized extremism and more ad-hoc manifestations of right-wing hatred. And early this past November, Potok was a busy man. The server for, the Web site of the world's largest white-supremacist organization, crashed immediately after Election Day; so did the server for, the Web site of the Council of Conservative Citizens, a group dedicated to "advocating against minorities and racial integration."

What's more, says Potok, there was a sharp spike in on-the-ground anti-Obama incidents following the election. Obama was hung in effigy, he says; Obama supporters had crosses burned in their yards; an Obama volunteer was beaten in New Orleans; kids on a school bus in Idaho struck up an "assassinate Obama" chant.

"Here, we're not really talking about a white-supremacist backlash," Potok contends. "The way I read it, this was very much a backlash from a sector of mainstream white America. That's what was most remarkable about it. Those kids in Idaho — that stuff doesn't come out of nowhere."

But then . . . things got quiet. "Within two to three weeks after the election," says Potok, "most of this just disappeared. Clearly, the immediate signs of an angry backlash have subsided. And whether it's something that's going to reverberate into the future is really in question."

A similar dynamic seems to be at work in the right-wing media. In the current issue of the Columbia Journalism Review, Michael Massing compares the anti-Obama climate created by Limbaugh, et al., during the campaign to the media mood that preceded the assassination of then-Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin.

The solution, Massing argues, isn't to re-impose the Fairness Doctrine, which would only inflame the right's victim complex (see "Fair Is Foul," News & Features, November 17, 2008). Instead, it's for the mainstream press to stop treating rabid right-wingers as benign curiosities (he cites the New York Times Magazine's recent cover story on Limbaugh and Barbara Walters's declaration that Limbaugh is one of the "Ten Most Fascinating People of 2008" as prominent derelictions of duty) and, instead, to start chronicling what they're actually saying.

1  |  2  |  3  |   next >
Related: Rise of the political bogeyman, With friends like these, Looking Back, More more >
  Topics: Media -- Dont Quote Me , Barack Obama, Barbara Walters, Bill Clinton,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Re: Toxic talk: Hating Obama
Where did all the hate come from?  Where in heaven's name have you been for the past 8 years.  Haven't you paid attention to what the left has been calling Bush for the past 8 years?   An author won a prize for a novel about assassinating Bush.   9/11 Truthers.  Michael Moore.  The list goes on and on.  Jeez, if you poison the well it doesn't magically clean itself up.  In fairness, Clinton got a lot of abuse too but it turned into an industry with Bush.   
By pchuck on 01/15/2009 at 12:00:51
Re: Toxic talk: Hating Obama
The new agriculture secretary nominee, tom vilsack, is a shill for monsanto, the company that is the most aggressive in pushing toxic, genetically modified frankenfood.  You obamabots are so holier than thou-change, change, etc., but all you did was elect an enemy corporatist fraud.
By Chilsden on 01/15/2009 at 12:18:51
Re: Toxic talk: Hating Obama
It's obamination and vilsack's monsanto frankenfood that's toxic, not legitamite attacks on obamination.
By Chilsden on 01/15/2009 at 12:36:15
Re: Toxic talk: Hating Obama
What a ridiculous and poorly written article. BTW, have you ever listened to Air America?
By Fake Name on 01/16/2009 at 12:48:55
Re: Toxic talk: Hating Obama
This is absolutely ridiculous. Bush is demonized and has more invective and hate sent his way than any president since Lincoln and poor Obama has some haters. Obama has terrible judgement, that is why conservatives do not like him. He picks 'pay to play" Richardson, "Marc Rich Fugitive Financier" pardoner Holder, "Tax Evader Tim" Geithner and multitudes of others to be in his cabinet. Yes he does say Marxist things like "spread the wealth around" that get him in trouble with folks like me that realize how scary that is. His view of a "flexible" Constitution based on a person's perspective is not what our founding fathers wanted. His animosity towards the 2nd Amendment in our"Bill of Rights" is why we do not like him. In closing, conservatives do not like him because of the "content of his character, not the color of his skin" Michael Steele all the way baby!
By scytale_ on 01/16/2009 at 6:59:47
Re: Toxic talk: Hating Obama
"Jeez, if you poison the well it doesn't magically clean itself up." Spot on. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The folks who hated Bush more than they loved their country are about to see the fruits of their labors. Nice work, a-holes.
By aging cynic on 01/17/2009 at 1:47:30
Re: Toxic talk: Hating Obama
Yup, I agree with aging cynic and scytale to a large extent.   Hating the fast talking Obama is fruitless though.  He primarily rose on the economic discontent and fear created by Clinton's signing of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley bill allowing for this now dead financial free-for-all.  A lot of the animosity comes from the fact that Obama 'has done nothing and done nothing' before being elected based solely on his rapping ability and charisma.  Things will probably get so bad in the next 4 years that the credit card companies will try to repossess our tattoos.
By bwanamogambo on 01/21/2009 at 11:25:28
Re: Toxic talk: Hating Obama
"In fairness, Clinton got a lot of abuse too but it turned into an industry with Bush. " It turned into an industry with Clinton. Fox News. Right wing talk radio as we know it. The liberals followed suit and heavily escalated with longstanding Hollywood connections and bombastic attacks. Hilarious to see every (non-biased in their minds I assume) previous commenters try but fail to assert that the history is any different. No, this shit started with Clinton, escalated with Bush and will go completely off the charts with Obama when unemployment is at 20% in 2010.
By BostonDan on 02/18/2009 at 1:27:38

Share this entry with Delicious
    The Times Co. actually seems intent on not getting to yes with Guild members
  •   THE BLESSING OF ABORTION  |  June 12, 2009
    Pro-choice provocateur: Meet Cambridge divinity dean Katherine Ragsdale
  •   TRANS FACT  |  May 20, 2009
    When a person in the center of a media maelstrom has had a sex change, is it fair game for the press?
  •   DEAL OR NO DEAL?  |  May 15, 2009
    Will the Globe 's biggest union balk at the Times Co.'s offer? Plus, the Christian Science Monitor 's quietly successful re-launch, and sportswriter Bill Simmons's GM jones
  •   DIE ANOTHER DAY  |  May 07, 2009
    The clock starts now on a potential Globe sale

 See all articles by: ADAM REILLY

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 

  |  Sign In  |  Register
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group