The Phoenix Network:
About  |  Advertise
News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In

Impeach John Roberts

The Chief Justice lied
By EDITORIAL  |  February 8, 2010


It is time for an enterprising and courageous member of the US House of Representatives to file articles of impeachment against the chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts. The charge: lying under oath.

More than four years ago, testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee prior to the full Senate vote that approved his appointment, Roberts said: "Like most people, I resist labels. I have told people, when pressed, that I prefer to be known as a modest judge. And, to me, that means . . . an appreciation that the role of the judge is limited; the judge is to decide cases before them; they're not to legislate; they're not to execute the law."

In plain English, Roberts under oath declared himself to be a judicial minimalist, a proponent of judicial restraint, someone who holds that legislators — not judges — make the law. He all but said, "I am not now, nor have I ever been, a judicial activist."

And yet there was nothing modest or minimalist or restrained about Roberts's role in the recent Supreme Court ruling that held that corporations can spend unlimited amounts of money to buy as much political advertising as they want in any political election they choose.

In deciding that case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Roberts joined his three right-wing brethren, Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito, and sometimes-moderate Justice Anthony Kennedy (who wrote the opinion), to overturn two federal precedents and strike down scores of national and related state laws, nuking 103 years of campaign-finance reform in the process.

This gang of five — all, not surprisingly, Republican appointees — has finally made the nation safe for a government of corporations, by corporations, for corporations.

The perversity of it all is that Roberts and his henchmen wrapped themselves in the mantle of free speech in delivering their ruling, which could well prove to be the final nail in the coffin of our diseased democracy.

Building on muddle-headed Supreme Court decisions going back to the early 19th century that declare corporations have many of the same rights as people, Roberts and his co-conspirators found that it would be gosh-darn unfair to deny corporations the same right to electioneer as is enjoyed by Jane and Joe Doe.

Never mind that corporations are not required to sit on juries. Overlook that they cannot vote. Forget that they cannot be called upon to shed blood in military service. Disregard that there is no corporate death tax, because corporations — unlike actual people — can live forever.

The Roberts court affirmed that corporations — even if controlled by foreign shareholders — have the same free-speech rights as American citizens. They just happen to have big bank accounts. Big deal.

Well, it is a big deal. In his dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens warned of the possible corrosive effect of unregulated corporate spending. President Barack Obama was blunter. The decision, he said, was "devastating," striking "at the heart of our democracy."

Corporations are only pools of money dedicated to making more money. They are owned by shareholders. If they are "people," then corporations are by that same line of reasoning slaves. Perhaps someone should remind the Roberts majority that the 13th Amendment outlawed slavery. Does that make the very existence of corporations — never once mentioned in the constitution — unconstitutional?

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Change? What change?, Split atop the RI Tea Party, A lawyer’s adventures in bad judgment, More more >
  Topics: The Editorial Page , Barack Obama, U.S. Government, Government and Politics,  More more >
| More

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 01/28 ]   "Adventures Close to Home"  @ Washington Street Art Center
[ 01/28 ]   Bern Nix Quartet  @ Outpost 186
[ 01/28 ]   Bill Frisell  @ Scullers
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   OBAMA'S VISION: ''AN AMERICA BUILT TO LAST''  |  January 25, 2012
    By any measure, President Barack Obama's State of the Union speech would have been considered a political winner, but coming just one day after the Republicans' constipated Florida-primary debate, Obama scored an undeniable triumph.
  •   STOPPING SOPA  |  January 18, 2012
    You can almost breathe a sigh of relief, though the fight is long from over. As of this writing, it looks increasingly as if Congress will — miraculously — fail to break the Internet.
  •   ROMNEY'S SECRET FORMULA  |  January 12, 2012
    The Republican nomination thing may not be as complicated as the media is making it out to be, but it sure is fun.
  •   HOW 'THREE STRIKES' LEGISLATION FAILS  |  January 04, 2012
    Despite evidence that "three strikes" mandatory sentencing laws don't work, are punishingly expensive for taxpayers, and make an already unfair criminal-justice system even more irrational and racist, the Massachusetts legislature seems hell-bent on enacting one.
    Pity John Boehner. By rights, as Speaker of the House of Representatives, Boehner should be considered one of Washington's most powerful leaders.

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL

RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed