The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Moonsigns  |  BandGuide  |  Blogs
 
 
February 27, 2008

Word Up Exclusive Author Q&A: Aimee Liu

  

Word Up pauses from our usual coverage of literary gossip and socialite authoresses to call your attention to the fact that it's National Eating Disorders Awareness Week. As such, we are quite pleased to present you with an online-only author interview with writer and lecturer Aimee Liu. In Liu's first memoir, 1979's Solitaire, she detailed her first battle with anorexia, and nearly three decades later she's returned with New York Times bestseller Gaining: The Truth About Life After Eating Disorders. Weaving research, interviews, and her own continued battle with the disease, Liu draws a number of insightful conclusions. Not only does she reject the notion that our culture's emphasis on thinness is the sole cause of eating disorders, but reveals that a true recovery requires a comprehensive understanding of one's own condition. Liu will speak about women’s body images, her research and experience, and Gaining tomorrow, February 28th, at Simmons College. Tickets are $10 for general admission; $5 for students; free for Simmons College students and staff. Visit www.medainc.org for more information.


Did you ever expect, after writing and publishing Solitaire, that you would write another book about anorexia and your
personal experiences with it?

When I wrote Solitaire I believed I was finished with eating disorders.  I used to say that I didn't want to become a "professional anorexic." I was eager to get on with a healthy life, writing fiction and books on psychological topics unrelated to eating disorders.  I didn't appreciate at that point how interesting and complex these conditions are, or how they connect with aspects of biology and psychology that have nothing to do with eating or weight.  Back then, in 1979, the science of eating disorders was still a mystery even to the medical establishment, so much of what I wanted to do with Gaining was to discover what we know now that no one knew then.

Your findings that our thin-worshipping culture--the media, the fashion industry, Hollywood--don't solely trigger an obsession with one's own weight is startling, given that so many point fingers at this.

Our thin-worshipping society elevates  extreme thinness as an ideal that all "perfect" women and girls must achieve.  This ideal comes across particularly loud and strong in status conscious homes and communities, where eating disorders tend to proliferate.  But it takes a perfectionist to CARE about achieving this perfect goal.  That's one of the ways that biology, in the form of innate temperament, plays a key role.  If you're not a born perfectionist, chance are you won't kill yourself (literally, as well as figuratively) to become perfectly thin.  By the same token, even if you are a perfectionist living in this culture, you probably won't develop an eating disorder if you learn to value yourself, your body, your health, and if you are encouraged and taught to develop personal ideals that are genuinely fulfilling and rewarding instead of self-defeating.  Finally, the typical trigger for eating disorders tends to be acute anxiety and/or depression.  So it's critical for everyone, but especially those who are perfectionistic and very sensitive, to learn positive, constructing coping skills, including techniques for relaxation, trust, self-awareness, and self-compassion, as early as possible.  

Tell me a bit about some of the things you learned from the people you interviewed for Gaining. Did they turn some of your earlier theories and assumptions on their head? How?

Like many people, I had always assumed that anyone can "get" an eating disorder (like catching a common cold).  The clear, strong patterns of personality traits among my interviewees astonished me.  People with histories of severe anorexia nervosa tended to be very introspective, quiet, diligent, driven, disciplined, idealistic, and averse to change.  People with histories of bulimia nervosa tended to be more impulsive, outgoing, people-pleasing but also rebellious.  BOTH groups were intensely perfectionistic and highly sensitive to criticism, yet prone to criticizing themselves (never feeling "good enough").  The amazing thing was how strong these traits remained in people even decades after they showed any of the stereotypical symptoms of eating disorders -- starving, bingeing, purging.  I came away from my interviews with an unexpected appreciation for eating disorders as a kind of window into the psyche.  If you develop an eating disorder, that tells you something very valuable about your own nature and personality.  You can learn from that.  The appearance of an eating disorder also signals distress, creating an opportunity (if those around you will help you heed it) to examine the circumstances surrounding the illness and pinpoint the TRUE source of distress...and develop healthier coping mechanisms for resolving that distress.  Perhaps the most unexpected reversal for me was the shift toward appreciating eating disorders as a kind of SOS, and NOT something either trivial or shameful.

Teenage girls today are constantly bombarded with the fact that they're being influenced and pressured by whatever is around them, but once they come out of adolescence and move on to adulthood, it's almost as if they're left to their own devices. Tell me a bit about how women in mid-life are just as easily prone to an eating disorder.

Mid-life for many women is a cruel refrain of adolescence.  As menopause looms and our bodies show the first signs of age, many of us become as self-conscious as teenagers.  We've become accustomed to the way men look at us, and suddenly men no longer look at us the same way.  Maybe they don't look at us at all.  Some of us find our marriages faltering or dissolving.  Suddenly we're back in the market for a mate, competing against younger contenders. Our careers lurch, and we're back to auditioning on the job market against younger contenders. Our kids leave home, and in that sense, we lose yet another childhood. Maybe we are dealing with serious medical problems for the first time in our lives. Or maybe it's just the shock of facing the mirror each morning and confronting the stranger we are becoming.  Some highly well-adjusted, well-loved, and passionately engaged women sail through this season of change, of course.  But many others are shell-shocked by the physical changes in their bodies and looks, just as many adolescents are.  Those women who have that innate tendency to fixate on a perfect ideal or react to anxiety by obsessing about food and weight or by numbing themselves through over- or under-eating may develop an eating disorder.

You're a former model, so I'm curious about your take on Dove's advertising campaign for "real beauty."

I love many aspects of the Dove campaign.  I do believe that beauty comes in all shapes and sizes, and that it's the human spirit within the body that makes the body beautiful.  I am also SO grateful to Dove for publicly unmasking the lies that go into those images of "perfect beauty" we all ogle on billboards and in fashion and beauty magazines.  Women really need to wake up to the fact that these photographs are virtually all doctored, and that many of the models presented as "women" are, in fact, young teenagers and even pre-teens.  My only concern is that these ads continue to focus, focus, focus on LOOKS.  Can't we ever move beyond our fixation on appearance, and create images of beauty that reflect women's creativity, intelligence, humor, athleticism, and other talents? 

What about the billboard Oliviero Toscani shot of a naked Isabelle Caro for Milan Fashion Week last September? Do you think the fashion industry can ever, should ever, or will ever change when it comes to thinness?


This is a very hot issue in the eating disorder community.  Designers demand models who are as thin as humanly (or inhumanly) possible because they claim these emaciated models make clothes look better.  Leaving aside the question of what size women actually buy their clothes, the designers have made no attempt to change the size or cut of the clothes they show on the runways, especially in the haute couture world.  This despite great fanfare last year over the fashion world's promises to promote a healthier look on the catwalks.  I think change will only come if and when wealthy women stop buying these clothes; fashion editors stop promoting Size Zero as the new Size Eight; and perhaps, if there is some sort of oversight imposed on the fashion industry.  Of course, an avalanche of protest letters to the companies that advertise in fashion magazines might have an impact too!!!

Why is it impossible to escape or bury a disease like anorexia, even if you seem to be "cured" on the outside?

It is impossible to "get rid of" the innate personality traits and instinctive responses to anxiety that set us up for eating disorders.  If we don't learn to re-train those traits and responses in healthy directions, they may go quiet for awhile only to resurface in a moment of stress years later, or they may push us toward self-destructive habits that are not eating-related.  I call this the "half-life" of eating disorders, when we continue to punish ourselves, but not through food.  However, if we become aware of these traits and tendencies, we can re-train them toward practices and pursuits that are fulfilling and constructive instead of self-destructive.  Perfectionism is a grand trait to have, for instance, as long as we develop "perfect" ideals that bring us genuine pleasure and deep satisfaction, that connect us to others instead of alienating us, and that make us feel more, not less, alive.

Your writing is so candid and emotional. Do you ever feel scared about what you revealed in the pages of Gaining?

I fervently believe that secrecy and shame fuel mental illness.  I also believe that we are all human, all vulnerable, and all flawed.  There is tremendous freedom to be gained in expressing and examining the flaws and frailties that make us all human.  Writing as honestly as possible is one form of this expression.  And I've found that when people read what I've written, it bring them relief, too, to know that they are not alone, not shameful or disgraceful, and not guilty.  I also believe that writing which is not candid and emotional is usually not honest and certainly not compelling.

Who were you writing this book for? Who do you hope to inspire?

Initially I was writing for the millions of people who have histories of eating disorders in their own history, because most do not realize how these conditions continue to reverberate in aspects of life that have nothing to do with eating.  I also hoped to alert them to the ways in which they might unintentionally nudge their children toward eating disorders, and to the patterns of family dynamics in general that are affected by these syndromes.  But I've been surprised by the number of people, even teenagers, still in treatment who have found hope in the book.  Hundreds of people have written me, sharing their frustrations and life stories.  Therapists, too, tell me that the book has sparked valuable discussions with patients.  Finally, I've come to realize how reassuring it is for parents to learn that there are certain traits they can look for to determine whether a child is -- or is not! -- highly susceptible to an eating disorder.  Ultimately, I am delighted when I hear that the book has inspired hope, self-awareness, and peace of mind.
Click here to read the full post
by Sharon Steel | with no comments
February 27, 2008

Word Up Exclusive Author Q&A: Aimee Liu

  

Word Up pauses from our usual coverage of literary gossip and socialite authoresses to call your attention to the fact that it's National Eating Disorders Awareness Week. As such, we are quite pleased to present you with an online-only author interview with writer and lecturer Aimee Liu. In Liu's first memoir, 1979's Solitaire, she detailed her first battle with anorexia, and nearly three decades later she's returned with New York Times bestseller Gaining: The Truth About Life After Eating Disorders. Weaving research, interviews, and her own continued battle with the disease, Liu draws a number of insightful conclusions. Not only does she reject the notion that our culture's emphasis on thinness is the sole cause of eating disorders, but reveals that a true recovery requires a comprehensive understanding of one's own condition. Liu will speak about women’s body images, her research and experience, and Gaining tomorrow, February 28th, at Simmons College. Tickets are $10 for general admission; $5 for students; free for Simmons College students and staff. Visit www.medainc.org for more information.


Did you ever expect, after writing and publishing Solitaire, that you would write another book about anorexia and your
personal experiences with it?

When I wrote Solitaire I believed I was finished with eating disorders.  I used to say that I didn't want to become a "professional anorexic." I was eager to get on with a healthy life, writing fiction and books on psychological topics unrelated to eating disorders.  I didn't appreciate at that point how interesting and complex these conditions are, or how they connect with aspects of biology and psychology that have nothing to do with eating or weight.  Back then, in 1979, the science of eating disorders was still a mystery even to the medical establishment, so much of what I wanted to do with Gaining was to discover what we know now that no one knew then.

Your findings that our thin-worshipping culture--the media, the fashion industry, Hollywood--don't solely trigger an obsession with one's own weight is startling, given that so many point fingers at this.

Our thin-worshipping society elevates  extreme thinness as an ideal that all "perfect" women and girls must achieve.  This ideal comes across particularly loud and strong in status conscious homes and communities, where eating disorders tend to proliferate.  But it takes a perfectionist to CARE about achieving this perfect goal.  That's one of the ways that biology, in the form of innate temperament, plays a key role.  If you're not a born perfectionist, chance are you won't kill yourself (literally, as well as figuratively) to become perfectly thin.  By the same token, even if you are a perfectionist living in this culture, you probably won't develop an eating disorder if you learn to value yourself, your body, your health, and if you are encouraged and taught to develop personal ideals that are genuinely fulfilling and rewarding instead of self-defeating.  Finally, the typical trigger for eating disorders tends to be acute anxiety and/or depression.  So it's critical for everyone, but especially those who are perfectionistic and very sensitive, to learn positive, constructing coping skills, including techniques for relaxation, trust, self-awareness, and self-compassion, as early as possible.  

Tell me a bit about some of the things you learned from the people you interviewed for Gaining. Did they turn some of your earlier theories and assumptions on their head? How?

Like many people, I had always assumed that anyone can "get" an eating disorder (like catching a common cold).  The clear, strong patterns of personality traits among my interviewees astonished me.  People with histories of severe anorexia nervosa tended to be very introspective, quiet, diligent, driven, disciplined, idealistic, and averse to change.  People with histories of bulimia nervosa tended to be more impulsive, outgoing, people-pleasing but also rebellious.  BOTH groups were intensely perfectionistic and highly sensitive to criticism, yet prone to criticizing themselves (never feeling "good enough").  The amazing thing was how strong these traits remained in people even decades after they showed any of the stereotypical symptoms of eating disorders -- starving, bingeing, purging.  I came away from my interviews with an unexpected appreciation for eating disorders as a kind of window into the psyche.  If you develop an eating disorder, that tells you something very valuable about your own nature and personality.  You can learn from that.  The appearance of an eating disorder also signals distress, creating an opportunity (if those around you will help you heed it) to examine the circumstances surrounding the illness and pinpoint the TRUE source of distress...and develop healthier coping mechanisms for resolving that distress.  Perhaps the most unexpected reversal for me was the shift toward appreciating eating disorders as a kind of SOS, and NOT something either trivial or shameful.

Teenage girls today are constantly bombarded with the fact that they're being influenced and pressured by whatever is around them, but once they come out of adolescence and move on to adulthood, it's almost as if they're left to their own devices. Tell me a bit about how women in mid-life are just as easily prone to an eating disorder.

Mid-life for many women is a cruel refrain of adolescence.  As menopause looms and our bodies show the first signs of age, many of us become as self-conscious as teenagers.  We've become accustomed to the way men look at us, and suddenly men no longer look at us the same way.  Maybe they don't look at us at all.  Some of us find our marriages faltering or dissolving.  Suddenly we're back in the market for a mate, competing against younger contenders. Our careers lurch, and we're back to auditioning on the job market against younger contenders. Our kids leave home, and in that sense, we lose yet another childhood. Maybe we are dealing with serious medical problems for the first time in our lives. Or maybe it's just the shock of facing the mirror each morning and confronting the stranger we are becoming.  Some highly well-adjusted, well-loved, and passionately engaged women sail through this season of change, of course.  But many others are shell-shocked by the physical changes in their bodies and looks, just as many adolescents are.  Those women who have that innate tendency to fixate on a perfect ideal or react to anxiety by obsessing about food and weight or by numbing themselves through over- or under-eating may develop an eating disorder.

You're a former model, so I'm curious about your take on Dove's advertising campaign for "real beauty."

I love many aspects of the Dove campaign.  I do believe that beauty comes in all shapes and sizes, and that it's the human spirit within the body that makes the body beautiful.  I am also SO grateful to Dove for publicly unmasking the lies that go into those images of "perfect beauty" we all ogle on billboards and in fashion and beauty magazines.  Women really need to wake up to the fact that these photographs are virtually all doctored, and that many of the models presented as "women" are, in fact, young teenagers and even pre-teens.  My only concern is that these ads continue to focus, focus, focus on LOOKS.  Can't we ever move beyond our fixation on appearance, and create images of beauty that reflect women's creativity, intelligence, humor, athleticism, and other talents? 

What about the billboard Oliviero Toscani shot of a naked Isabelle Caro for Milan Fashion Week last September? Do you think the fashion industry can ever, should ever, or will ever change when it comes to thinness?


This is a very hot issue in the eating disorder community.  Designers demand models who are as thin as humanly (or inhumanly) possible because they claim these emaciated models make clothes look better.  Leaving aside the question of what size women actually buy their clothes, the designers have made no attempt to change the size or cut of the clothes they show on the runways, especially in the haute couture world.  This despite great fanfare last year over the fashion world's promises to promote a healthier look on the catwalks.  I think change will only come if and when wealthy women stop buying these clothes; fashion editors stop promoting Size Zero as the new Size Eight; and perhaps, if there is some sort of oversight imposed on the fashion industry.  Of course, an avalanche of protest letters to the companies that advertise in fashion magazines might have an impact too!!!

Why is it impossible to escape or bury a disease like anorexia, even if you seem to be "cured" on the outside?

It is impossible to "get rid of" the innate personality traits and instinctive responses to anxiety that set us up for eating disorders.  If we don't learn to re-train those traits and responses in healthy directions, they may go quiet for awhile only to resurface in a moment of stress years later, or they may push us toward self-destructive habits that are not eating-related.  I call this the "half-life" of eating disorders, when we continue to punish ourselves, but not through food.  However, if we become aware of these traits and tendencies, we can re-train them toward practices and pursuits that are fulfilling and constructive instead of self-destructive.  Perfectionism is a grand trait to have, for instance, as long as we develop "perfect" ideals that bring us genuine pleasure and deep satisfaction, that connect us to others instead of alienating us, and that make us feel more, not less, alive.

Your writing is so candid and emotional. Do you ever feel scared about what you revealed in the pages of Gaining?

I fervently believe that secrecy and shame fuel mental illness.  I also believe that we are all human, all vulnerable, and all flawed.  There is tremendous freedom to be gained in expressing and examining the flaws and frailties that make us all human.  Writing as honestly as possible is one form of this expression.  And I've found that when people read what I've written, it bring them relief, too, to know that they are not alone, not shameful or disgraceful, and not guilty.  I also believe that writing which is not candid and emotional is usually not honest and certainly not compelling.

Who were you writing this book for? Who do you hope to inspire?

Initially I was writing for the millions of people who have histories of eating disorders in their own history, because most do not realize how these conditions continue to reverberate in aspects of life that have nothing to do with eating.  I also hoped to alert them to the ways in which they might unintentionally nudge their children toward eating disorders, and to the patterns of family dynamics in general that are affected by these syndromes.  But I've been surprised by the number of people, even teenagers, still in treatment who have found hope in the book.  Hundreds of people have written me, sharing their frustrations and life stories.  Therapists, too, tell me that the book has sparked valuable discussions with patients.  Finally, I've come to realize how reassuring it is for parents to learn that there are certain traits they can look for to determine whether a child is -- or is not! -- highly susceptible to an eating disorder.  Ultimately, I am delighted when I hear that the book has inspired hope, self-awareness, and peace of mind.
Click here to read the full post
by webteam | with 2 comment(s)
February 27, 2008

Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen's Literary Influence



The Interweb is exploding with book deals today. Er, maybe not -- perhaps it is just in our own strange little brain/world.

People reports:

Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen can now add author to their growing list of professions.

The 21-year-old twins will pen a new book together called Influence that features artists and fashion designers who have inspired the savvy fashionistas over the past decade, Penguin books announced Wednesday.

Perhaps the book will actually be affordable, unlike their redonkulously unjustifiably over-priced fashion lines The Row and Elizabeth and James. Hmph.

Click here to read the full post
by Sharon Steel | with no comments
February 27, 2008

Marisha Pessl: Fuck-Me Boots, Round Deux?



It's deal day for Publisher's Lunch Weekly. Fresh out of the inbox:

General/Other
Marisha Pessl's NIGHT FILM, a psychological thriller about obsession, family loyalty and ambition set in raw contemporary Manhattan, moving to Kate Medina at Random House, by her new agent Amanda Urban at ICM.

Uh, so was that a nice deal? A very nice deal? A good deal? A significant deal? OR A MAJOR DEAL (a/k/a here's a check for half a million dollars, you win the author lotto again!) Inquiring minds are inquiring, and obviously, we wish we knew. While Word Up has been slightly divided and somewhat confused by the way Pessl and her publisher have handled her author publicity, we personally are enormous fans of her work. Special Topics in Calamity Physics was our favorite novel of 2006, after all. Speaking of, you know who should totally play Blue in the movie version? AMBER TAMBLYN. We only just had this revelation of sorts.

Click here to read the full post
by Sharon Steel | with 3 comment(s)
February 26, 2008

More "Fine Lines": Why obsess over the NYTBR when you can obsess over 80's YA?

Hell to the yes. "Fine Lines," the newish Friday feature at ultimate lady-blog Jezebel just keeps getting more and more delish. The past fortnight showcased two of our especial YA favorites: The Cat Ate My Gymsuit by Paula Danziger and Elizabeth George Speare's The Witch of Blackbird Pond. Read them both, then come back to us, if you choose. YA-Rant Alert!



We own almost every single Danziger book. We bought most of them used at garage sales or from that Scholastic book-buying catalog thing they always had once a month at our school (which furnished most of our youthful library! when the books came it was like nerd holiday and birthday all in one!). Cat is probably our pet Danzinger tale, mostly because it's written about an outcast from the perspective of said outcast, it never gets overly precious, it's raw and honest and lonely and real, and shit, Marcy is a total card! What a hidden firecracker!

So yes, we adored her in Cat, but then suddenly we found ourselves SERIOUSLY DISAPPOINTED in Danziger for turning Marcy's whole life story around in an unpleasantly cliched manner. The sequel novel about our girl, There's a Bat in Bunk Five, catches us up to Marcy about a year later: she's lost a ton of weight, is suddenly pretty (no more awkward adolescence at 15? how nice for her!), and scores one of the cutest, wittiest, guitar-playing dudes at the artsy fartsy camp Ms. Finney and her hot, bearded husband run instead of teaching English to ungrateful public school kids. Phew. It's like -- what gives? One of the things that was so wonderful about Cat is that at the end, everything doesn't turn out to be 100%! And that's cool! Because newsflash! Not every social wallflower BLOSSOMS LIKE A LOVELY DELICATE FLOWER in two seconds after their phsycial appearance changes for the better. Duh! It's just upsetting. We felt as though something was STOLEN FROM OUR HEARTS after we read Bat. The worst part? Yes, we were jealous of Marcy! When we were supposed to be relating to her! What happened?!



On the other hand, The Witch of Blackbird Pond always satisfied and freaked us out to the nines every time we read and read and reread it in middle school. So delicious! Such a perfect teen precursor to our beloved Daphne du Maurier's Rebecca, the sort of haunting romantical coming-of-age mystery creep-fest that makes life worth living! Kit, dear, headstrong Kit, is flawed -- and yet -- she's all fierceness and fabulosity. Old Hag has her totally figured out: she screws up, but we can't help but love her to pieces by the end. Plus, the Purtians! Connecticut colonial wilderness! Crippled Mercy and her big blue eyes! Boys in breeches! Sharp-tongued Nat! CONSIDERING the idea of marrying simply to get out of doing back-breaking housework! Oh, god. Where, oh where, is that Scholastic book catalog when we need it? Or a used bookstore? Or a library? We want tea and old books, now, forever, yesterday.

Click here to read the full post
by webteam | with 4 comment(s)
February 25, 2008

F.S.G's Moving Day: "The money went into the books, not painting the walls."



The intimidating publisher of serious and lovely books, Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, is moving to a new HQ. Editors and publicists have been toiling away without hot water in the ladies' bathroom sinks! Rebecca Mead explains in her "Talk of the Town" this week.

“You had to put your own hot-water tank in, and that was not something that was in the F.S.G. budget,” Isenberg, who is a senior vice-president and director of operations at the company, explained the other day. “The money went into the books, not into painting the walls.” Elaine Kramer, the company’s longest-serving employee, who was hired in the accounts department in 1952, said that, while the employees were happy about the prospect of improved amenities—there will be a pantry, so for the first time coffee will be made in-house, rather than brought in—many of the writers, over the years, had been attached to the house’s primitive living conditions. “Isaac Singer—he liked it that way,” Kramer said.

It's almost too perfect -- not to mention hilarious -- that the writers were the only ones who adored the "primitive conditions" that existed.

Click here to read the full post
by webteam | with no comments
February 22, 2008

"Titles change!"



David Sedaris: we are fans, we must admit. Not of all of his work, but much of it. We missed the fact that the title of his latest book, set for a June publication date, keeps on changing. Leon Neyfakh at the Observer didn't, and asked Sedaris to please explain.

We can't help but sort of adore the fact that Sedaris loves the titles his boyfriend suggests and then, ultimately, rejects them. He should write an essay about that, we think.

When You Are Engulfed in Flames sounds apropo to us. It provides magical cover art possibilities, at the very least.

Click here to read the full post
by webteam | with no comments
February 20, 2008

Lit-Tionary



This Independent piece got The Elegant Variation musing about various possible literary genres. It's an amusing list, and the comment-supplied suggestions are great, too.

Click here to read the full post
by Sharon Steel | with 13 comment(s)
February 15, 2008

Intriguing Australian author alert

“The world is getting hotter, the ice caps are melting, because man keeps saying to nature, Hey, our whole idea of a cozy future is to have jobs. That’s all we’ve got planned. What’s more, we will pursue this aim at any cost, even, paradoxically, if it means the eventual destruction of our workplace. Man says, Sacrifice industry and economy and jobs? For what? Future generations? I don’t even know those guys! I’ll tell you something for free ― it makes me ashamed that our species, which is so finely ennobled by its sacrifices, winds up sacrificing it all for the wrong things and comes off looking like a race of people who like to use their hair dryer while taking a bath . . . Yes, the truth of the matter is there has yet to be a great democratic nation because there has yet to be a great bunch of people.”

So runs a sample from Steve Toltz’s debut novel, A Fraction of the Whole, which, from the excerpts I’ve read, is galloping, ranty, colorful. It’s also, according to some background materials, a dysfunctional family story, a funny-serious take-down of media and politics, a delve into the human psyche, and an articulation of “the near-impossibility of living sincerely amidst other people.” For more of a taste, watch a haunting little video on Toltz’s Australian publisher’s web site.

 

Comparisons to the Pessls and Shteyngarts and Safran Foers have started (don’t hold it against him?). And the backstory to the writing sounds like a novel itself ― the Australian Toltz wrote the novel while living in Europe, above acrobats in Barcelona, sharing a studio in Paris, and the book arrived on an editor’s desk wholly unsolicited.

 

Toltz reads from A Fraction of the Whole this coming Presidents’ Day, Monday, February 18, at 7 pm at Brookline Booksmith.   

 

Click here to read the full post
by Nina MacLaughlin | with no comments
February 12, 2008

Anna Nicole Smith baby-drama bleeds into her latest unauthorized biography



The New York Daily News
reports today that the authors of the new Anna Nicole Smith book are suing their own publisher.

Jody (Babydol) Gibson, a former Hollywood "super madam," is selling "Anna Nicole Smith: Portrait of an Icon" online through her imprint, Corona. But authors Pol' Atteu and Patrik Simpson tell me they backed out of their arrangement with Gibson and are selling a separate "signature edition" through publisher Kings Road.

We can't believe we had to look up what a "super madam" was. We are appropriately humbled. We also think Anna looks absolutely, unequivocably, utterly gorgeous in the above photo. The rest? Typical.


Click here to read the full post
by Sharon Steel | with no comments
February 11, 2008

Modern Love Breeds Book Deals



We realized long ago that we were not alone in the fact that we loved to hate Modern Love, a New York Times Sunday Style column equal to a 1,700-word cringe-fest. In this week's New York Observer, Doree Shafrir expertly dissects the column and its uncanny ability to breed book deals.

“I read the Styles section religiously, but my eyes glaze over the Modern Love column,” said an editor at Random House. “I assume it’s going to be a woman getting over her divorce. But maybe that’s it, it’s like Sex and the City, it’s a stimulus-and-response thing. It speaks to people. It just pushes the right buttons. And somehow that’s validating, to know that other people are suffering, getting divorced, sleep with their colleagues. They’re unabashedly confessional and really voyeuristic. That’s pleasurable for people to read sometimes.”

Despite our unabashed obsession with crappy reality television, we don't find Modern Love very delicious or relatable. But perhaps we're deadened to it after having our buttons pushed by Gilmore Girls reruns and Gabriel Garcia Marquez.

Perhaps someone with access to BookScan could tell us how all the Love titles are doing now?

Click here to read the full post
by Sharon Steel | with no comments
February 05, 2008

Mortified: Love is a Battlefield tomorrow at the Paradise Lounge




In this week's fishwrap we chatted with Mortified creator David Nadelberg about social wallflowers, accidental art, and his new romance-themed anthology. It's 275 pages filled with brutally humiliating tales of love and lust and youth. We cannot be the only people who live for this sort of thing.

Tomorrow night, we beg of you: go see the Mortified Boston stage show at 8 pm at the Paradise Lounge, followed by a book-signing of Mortified: Love is a Battlefield with Nadelberg himself. It's $12. And Freeks & Geeks creator/champion of the unpopular kids in high school Paul Feig hearts the entire venture, so, you know, it's not just us. How awesome is that cover? We love this person, whoever they are. Share the shame, and in the meantime, watch the Mortified Showbox Show's latest web-isode, "Everyone's a Critic." (You may remember Will as the guy you wanted to be best friends with after listening to that This American Life episode, "Parental Guidance Suggested," in which he read letters that he wrote to his Grandma because he didn't have friends, OMG.) Our heart. It breaks. Continually.
Click here to read the full post
by Sharon Steel | with no comments
February 04, 2008

Monday Round-Up: Spilled Milk



James Frey is serious about his come-back, so much so that he's jazzing up his forthcoming novel, Bright Shiny Morning, with jacket art by his friend Richard Prince. He's also thinking of going Ira Glass on us, with a book tour that the New York Post's Page Six likens to something that sounds more like a concert tour:

"We're talking about having bands, other authors reading their work. We may try to include some pyrotechnics," he said with a laugh."

Elsewhere, New York Times reporter and Pulitzer Prize winner David Car Johnston is pissed about how the Sunday Book Review handled his tome, Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves At Government Expense (And Stick You With The Bill). Complaints as noted by Editor & Publisher's Joe Strupp are here, the review in question itself, by Jonathan Chait, is here.

Recession arriving in T-minus now? Magazines, in trouble? Why, you don't say. Of course, it's fashion week, when even retail miracles seem possible. Unfortunately, the publishing industry doesn't have an equivalent. Unless you count BEA?

Click here to read the full post
by Sharon Steel | with no comments
February 01, 2008

Fine Lines: It's Like Eating Your Favorite Book



Okay, we feel badly for calling out Jezebel about the whole bitter thing -- it's not all the time! it's just about certain stuff! and we understand how they feel because excessive shallowness is annoying! -- but anyway, we are kissing their collective bums over this Friday Fine Lines feature that they've been running for the past while. We've been meaning to tell you about it but neglected to because we have a lot of trouble concentrating on Fridays. So each week, Lizzie Skurnick reviews and discusses the YA books beloved to most girls in their youth. It's the-next-to-most-delicious-thing other than actually sitting down and rereading them. Today's feature is about the brilliant Katherine Patterson's Jacob Have I Loved, which we totally forgot after our recent revived obsession with Judy Blume yet is absolutely one of our favorite, favorite, FAVORITE YA's of all time. How amazing is that cover. We can't even talk about it. LOUISE WAS TOTALLY THE PRETTIER SISTER. We really want to stop off at the BPL, hustle up to the kid's section, borrow it, take it home, and cry about it all weekend. Our heart breaks.

Click here to read the full post
by Sharon Steel | with 259 comment(s)
February 01, 2008

Swag Off



This Thursday Styles piece about beauty bloggers and swag is basically just repackages a million-year old story about beauty editors (or fashion editors, or whatever kind of editor) and the swag that they're inundated with on a regular basis.

What's funny is the subsequent debate that flared up on Jezebel. Word Up loves the Jezzies but man, they've been bitter lately. We guess yelling at people for jumping on the Juno backlash wagon is okay, but enjoying the idea of playing with make-up as we approach a recession is not? For what it's worth, the impending recession is exactly the sort of thing that makes a lot of girls want to buy themselves cheap lipgloss and chai lattes to help them feel better about life. Delicious books to read while drinking the chai lattes are also in order, which brings us back to the freeloading.

We were just imagining how odd and awkward it would be if the publishing industry worked more like the beauty industry does. So, say Elizabeth Gilbert pens another find-yourself-travel-memoir that is set in Hawaii, just for example's sake. And her publicist sends out a few select emails that go something like this: Dear Book Editor, we would like to fly you to Honolulu and give you spa treatments to help you remember your spirit and vibe with Liz's latest message! OMG please come! It's our treat! Yay! Then write about it! And give Liz another hot-30something-blonde spread in the pages of your magazine!

Instead of, you know, sending out a galley, and advance praise blurbs and then following up with a comped review copy of the book. Which can also work wonders. Especially if Oprah gets involved.

We're quite sure the alternative scheme would never happen. But considering how shallow the publishing industry can be sometimes, we suppose it suffers silently in its own way. Even if the latest chick-lit or lad-lit from whatever major house doesn't come with a free jar of La Mer.

Click here to read the full post
by Sharon Steel | with 1 comment(s)
ABOUT THIS BLOG
On The Phoenix's books blog, we obsess over literature so that you don't have to. Reviews, readings, news, and literary gossip. Levar Burton might not have wanted you to take his word for it. But we do.
More about this blog
SUBSCRIBE




Saturday, July 25, 2009  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group