The Phoenix Network:
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
GG-1000x50

WikiLeaks: What it means

Plus, Mitt Romney — right-wing nut
By EDITORIAL  |  July 28, 2010

1008_afghanistan_main

Only a day after three of the world's most-prominent news organizations — the New York Times, the Guardian, and Der Spiegel —published reports based on the 90,000-plus purloined secret Afghanistan War documents released by WikiLeaks, the US House of Representatives passed a $59 billion war-funding bill on a vote of 308 to 114, sending it to President Barack Obama for his signature.

READ:Afghanistan: The war that's killing us, by Peter Kadzis
One hundred and two Democrats voted against final passage, as did 12 Republicans. Perhaps if there is a lesson to be learned from the episode, it's that the best way to motivate Republicans to work with Democrats is to present them with a seemingly unwinnable war.

These things are hard to measure, but it is doubtful that the WikiLeaks disclosures changed much in this particular roll call. Still, the 114 votes against the funding bill represent the emergence of an identifiable anti-war coalition. Expect it to grow, especially as the midterm elections approach.

The records released in the WikiLeaks document dump show that the war, if it is not unwinnable, is clearly not being won. America and its NATO allies are, in the words of a Vietnam-era protest song, "waist deep in the big muddy."

Talking heads point out that people who have been following the war closely will find little that's new in the documents. In a smarty-pants sort of way, that's true. But, memo to experts: most people are not news hounds.

What the media summaries and distillations of this mountain of granular military reporting do is firmly establish a critical mass of information and fix it in a specific moment in time. The debate over the war will not be the same post-WikiLeaks. That is why Obama has so shrewdly sought to downplay the release.

The most damaging revelations, likely to alarm the left and the right, are the degree to which America's partners in Pakistan's spy service are actively working with the Taliban and assisting efforts to assassinate Afghan government officials, and the persistent theft of humanitarian aid money destined for the likes of widows and orphans. In other words, our friends are playing us for suckers.

In the meantime, it seems that our enemies are even better armed than previously thought. The Taliban have gained access to heat-seeking missiles and are using that weaponry with increasing frequency to down military aircraft. It was the arrival of such missiles that spelled doom for the Soviets when they staged their own Afghanistan adventure. This news is unwelcome and — until now — had been suppressed.

WikiLeaks was not able to derail funding for the war, but release of these "secrets" should serve as a building block in the effort to leave Afghanistan.

Mitt does it again
Mitt Romney is an opportunist's opportunist. Whether making his fortune buying and reselling undervalued companies, flip-flopping on abortion rights, or turning a Massachusetts same-sex-marriage ruling into his ticket to national conservative prominence, Romney knows how to exploit a situation.

Now, in preparation for launching his next presidential run, Romney has deplorably seized another opportunity: to be the voice of opposition to the New START treaty, which is designed to reduce the nuclear stockpiles of Russia and the US in an effort to make the world a safer place.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Buzz off, The moron minority, Rough Seas Ahead, More more >
  Topics: The Editorial Page , Mitt Romney, Media, Afghanistan,  More more >
| More
Add Comment
HTML Prohibited

 Friends' Activity   Popular   Most Viewed 
[ 12/22 ]   Great Lakes + Ghost Thrower + Save Ends + Choke Up  @ Middle East Upstairs
[ 12/22 ]   The Christmas Revels  @ Sanders Theatre
[ 12/22 ]   Boston Ballet  @ Opera House
ARTICLES BY EDITORIAL
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   STRONG-ARMING THE FIRST AMENDMENT  |  December 15, 2010
    President Barack Obama is a bright guy. In fact, he's a former constitutional-law professor.
  •   WIKI PARADOXES  |  December 08, 2010
    Trust us: It is only a matter of time before Hollywood brings the saga of WikiLeaks impresario Julian Assange to the big screen.
  •   WHAT DELEO AND MURRAY SHOULD DO  |  December 01, 2010
    WHY LEGISLATIVE LEADERS SHOULD ACT NOW TO MAKE THE PATRONAGE SCANDAL HISTORY
  •   PATRONAGE = CORRPUTION  |  November 23, 2010
    The Massachusetts legislature is shocked — shocked! — that patronage is rife in the Probation Department! Shocked that it exists anywhere in state government! And it looks as if the both the House and the Senate will be damned if they are going to do anything about it.
  •   MISTER ROGERS  |  November 18, 2010
    Malcolm Rogers, top man at Boston's Museum of Fine Arts, has managed to do at his institution what former Harvard president Larry Summers failed to do at his: curb internal self-indulgence and channel creative energy toward serving 21st-century needs.

 See all articles by: EDITORIAL

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2010 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group