The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
FallGuide2009

Man bites newspaper

The genesis of the newspaper problems can be traced to Richard Nixon.
By STEVEN STARK  |  April 19, 2009

090417_stark_main

It's not news that newspapers are in huge trouble — victims of technological change and a mini-depression. What is news is the unadorned glee that is greeting the demise of newsprint.

When auto or city workers lose their jobs, there's talk of bailouts and extra measures to cushion the trauma, and even mournful country songs written in tribute. And when newspapers close? The blogs are full of self-congratulations at the demise of the journalistic establishment.

"Seeing newspapers fall apart brings me joy," writes an anonymous essayist in a broadside reprinted on the blog Reflections of a Newsosaur. Then there was the throng of commentators on boston.com that rejoiced over news the Boston Globe might close.

Part of this sour reaction is due to the traditional American love of any new futuristic innovation or technology. The past be damned! But a large part of it can be traced back more than 30 years to Richard Nixon. It was he who made hatred of the mainstream press fashionable, and his administration's cultural legacy continues to this day.

Of course, Nixon and his aides weren't the first Oval Office denizens to complain about the press; nor was he the first to accuse journalists of bias. Abraham Lincoln beat him to that punch when he closed border newspapers during the Civil War on the grounds they were too pro-Southern.

And, as it turns out, Nixon later had good reason to loathe the press, since he was eventually dislodged from office in the Watergate scandal in large part because of the solid investigative work of the fourth estate.

But it was Vice-President Spiro Agnew who actually delivered the tirade in 1969 (and who also later left office in disgrace) that launched millions of press haters. In a speech supposedly written by Pat Buchanan, Agnew attacked a "small band of network commentators" who, he charged, were a "tiny and closed fraternity of privileged men, elected by no one." Because of what he called their dedication to the "endless pursuit of controversy," he called on the networks to be "more responsive to the views of the nation and more responsible to the people they serve."

Note that Agnew was specifically attacking the networks — whose licenses come from the government — and not the press as a whole, at least in that speech. Nevertheless, his remarks struck a chord — as did the Nixon administration's continual campaign against "the media" — a term it popularized because it felt "the media" sounded far colder and more distant than "the press."

It wasn't long before the whole conservative movement had taken up the cry that the media establishment was biased against its cause and, by implication, the concerns of Middle America. Whereas liberal populism had once railed against financial titans, conservative populism now targeted editors, publishers, and reporters (among others) as the new dangerous elite.

1  |  2  |   next >
Related: Will the Globe survive?, Short-sighted?, Stop whining and do your job, More more >
  Topics: Stark Ravings , Media, Newspapers, Newspapers,  More more >
  • Share:
  • Share this entry with Facebook
  • Share this entry with Digg
  • Share this entry with Delicious
  • RSS feed
  • Email this article to a friend
  • Print this article
Comments
Re: Man bites newspaper
Unfortunately, I think this piece misses the mark, and is emblematic of why newspapers are going under. That is, newspapers are based on a gatekeeper model of information distribution. Journalists may procure the information, but editors determine what is "fit to print." Now, though, everyone has seen the man behind the curtain -- and are unwilling to have their access to information diluted. For example, I live in Houston and read the Houston sports writers. Do I think they are good? Not particularly, but I like sports. They cover the beat. What is my complaint? They have the same world view as any other sports writer. Their audience really isn't me -- neither more or less papers will be sold because the Houston sports information consumers think the newspaper sports writers are good or bad. Thus, the sportswriters serve one master -- their editor. Keep him happy, and they keep their job. But, I can also get sports statistics faster now from online sources -- rather than having to wait for the newspaper. And I can mostly catch live feeds of sports I am interested (or clips) from cable or the internet. Further, for commentary, I can be involved in blogs -- and the network of bloggers tends to be able to provide more accuracy and insight than a single full time sports write can. And the bloggers are not curtailed by an editor's taste. We decide what's fit to print. And if offended, one can respond in kind. See, our resentment from the gatekeepers stem from their insularity and power. Remember the adage, "Don't ever get into an argument with someone who buys newsprint by the gallon." Well, the glee comes from having the might fall a bit -- and the resultant leveling of the playing field. Get back to serving the consumer, and not the gatekeepers -- and there will always be a market. The technology may change, but the demand, if anything, increases.
By victorwelch on 04/14/2009 at 6:01:09

ARTICLES BY STEVEN STARK
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MEN PLUS MONEY EQUALS MESS  |  May 14, 2009
    Since Iceland is something of the epicenter of the global financial crisis — its government being the first to essentially go belly up — it's probably not surprising that the Icelanders have come up with the most novel and interesting theory as to what caused the meltdown. And they may be right.
  •   ARLEN THE FAMILY  |  May 11, 2009
    So, Arlen Specter is now a Democrat. That's old news.
  •   SPARE CHANGE?  |  April 28, 2009
    A tension lies at the heart of the Obama presidency. After 100 days in office, the public still seems uncertain how to interpret the historic nature of the election last November.
  •   COURTHOUSE MARRIAGE  |  April 21, 2009
    While political analysts understandably regard elections and politicians as the key forces of social change, nongovernmental forces are the ones that most often actually influence and transform our culture.
  •   MAN BITES NEWSPAPER  |  April 19, 2009
    It's not news that newspapers are in huge trouble — victims of technological change and a mini-depression. What is news is the unadorned glee that is greeting the demise of newsprint.

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group