The Phoenix Network:
 
 
 
About  |  Advertise
Adult  |  Moonsigns  |  Band Guide  |  Blogs  |  In Pictures
 
Media -- Dont Quote Me  |  News Features  |  Talking Politics  |  This Just In
bmp_2009

Wish upon a czar

Paul Krugman could be Obama’s economic dream come true
By STEVEN STARK  |  February 18, 2009

090220-krugman_Mian

It’s one month into Barack Obama’s presidency and it’s already clear that the economic team isn’t making the grade. Larry Summers helps craft a stimulus plan that almost no other economist thinks will work — at least as well as it should. Timothy Geithner announces his bank-rescue plan and the market immediately drops 300 points.

The solution? Appoint Paul Krugman economic czar.

Krugman, of course, is a Nobel Prize–winning economist from Princeton, who’s also a formidable columnist for the New York Times. He obviously knows Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke well from Princeton (Bernanke made Krugman the job offer that brought him to campus), so they’ll work well together. And he offers three huge advantages over anyone Obama has appointed so far:

1) HE KNOWS WHAT TO DO Admittedly, this is a subjective category — you have to buy into Krugman’s notions (which I do) that the stimulus package was vastly under-funded and untargeted; that we’re suffering from a solvency problem, not a liquidity problem with the banks; that some banks need to be nationalized, etc., etc.

But whether you agree with Krugman or not, at least his prescriptions are coherent and dramatic. The good news about Obama’s economic policies so far is that they’ve managed to fulfill his campaign promise of uniting both sides. The bad news is that they’ve done so largely by fusing left and right in opposition to what he’s done. Krugman’s appointment would eliminate half the opposition, and the Republicans are never going to support Obama anyway.

2) HE’S UNTAINTED In legal ethics, the standard is not whether an individual has done anything wrong, but whether he or she gives “the appearance of impropriety.” Applying that standard, Summers and Geithner don’t cut it because they’re too identified with the policies of the past, and with Bob Rubin.

During his tenure under Bill Clinton, Summers curtailed Commodity Future Trading Commissioner Brooksley Born’s attempts to regulate derivatives. His protégé Geithner, as president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank from mid-2003 on, was in a position to try to address this crisis years ago. But he didn’t see it coming, either.

Every time these men take an action that seems to help an old friend at a bank — and they seem to be doing it often — they raise questions about their impartiality. That’s unacceptable — and it’s a problem Krugman doesn’t have.

Besides, Summers’s and Geithner’s experience may be limiting them. This is a new kind of crisis that requires a new kind of thinking. To this point, to use the old cliché, Obama’s mainstream-to-a-fault economic team hasn’t been able to think outside the box.

3) HE’S A TERRIFIC COMMUNICATOR This may, in fact, be Krugman’s most important attribute. Whatever one thinks of Geithner, public speaking is not one of his strengths: one wag described his recent bank-bailout-plan announcement as akin to “an elf giving a book report.”

As for Summers, his communication problems have been well publicized. Suffice it to say that he’s been in office only a month and he’s already managed to alienate Obama appointee and former Fed chairman Paul Volcker.

In contrast, Krugman is articulate. One of the president’s principal failures so far is that he’s tellingly failed to give the nation a narrative that explains the economic crisis and how he plans to solve it. Without that, the public will never give him the time he needs to address what are deep-rooted problems that can’t be cured overnight. Besides, without such an explanation, everything he does looks seat-of-the-pants and reactive.

Despite his oratorical prowess, Obama has not given a good speech in months. In truth, Obama was terrific when he was talking about himself — whether it was on the primary stump or in his book. That’s not a criticism: when one runs for president, promoting yourself is the major requirement.

But now that Obama has to talk about our struggles — not his own — he’s having trouble. Krugman could give him the ideas and the eloquence he needs.

Paul Krugman for economic czar. Now that’s change we can believe in. 

To read the “Stark Ravings” blog, go to thePhoenix.com/blogs/starkravings. Steven Stark can be reached at sds@starkwriting.com.

Related: Nice package, BHO's no FDR, Spare Change?, More more >
  Topics: Stark Ravings , Barack Obama, Ben Bernanke, Business,  More more >
  • Share:
  • RSS feed Rss
  • Email this article to a friend Email
  • Print this article Print
Comments
Re: Wish upon a czar
I totaly agree with you, so far, Krugman has been the only one to explain "clearly" how we can deal with this recession.You may not agree with him but at least, he knows what he's talking about opposed to Geitner or Summers.Each time you hear them, it's seem to me that they really dont have a long term view in how we can recover from this deep recesssion.
Why not publishing a website for those who think he could be a top ecomic adviser and see what's the public reaction ?   thks Ameth
By Mohamed on 02/20/2009 at 6:39:52
Re: Wish upon a czar
 I have tried to e-mail you to congratulate you on this article.  I have been confounded for some time now that Paul Krugman who has all the attributes you note is not even part of a presidential advisory group. What gives with that?
   I've noted that the adminstration sometimes changes their tune on economic policy, and the change reflects stuff that Krugman has recently written in his column. So I think he is read and he is respected by the White House folks. (afterthought--can they worry he'll outshine them?)     If president Obama can reach across the aisle to unlikely and unwilling bedfellows, what stands in the way of his inclusion of Mr. Krugman, our country's current Nobel Prize winner, in some capacity in the administration?  'Tis a puzzle.     One of the reasons I rely on his column as a guide through all of this economic turmoil is that he is a person who has a clear moral compass, and values nearly all of us share. 
By JaneHWB on 02/20/2009 at 4:47:20
Re: Wish upon a czar
 I have tried to e-mail you to congratulate you on this article.  I have been confounded for some time now that Paul Krugman who has all the attributes you note is not even part of a presidential advisory group. What gives with that?
   I've noted that the adminstration sometimes changes their tune on economic policy, and the change often reflects stuff that Krugman has recently written in his column. So I think he is read and he is respected by the White House folks. (afterthought--can they worry he'll outshine them?)     If president Obama can reach across the aisle to unlikely and unwilling bedfellows, what stands in the way of his inclusion of Mr. Krugman, our country's current Nobel Prize winner, in some capacity in the administration?  'Tis a puzzle.     One of the reasons I rely on his column as a guide through all of this economic turmoil is that he is a person who has a clear moral compass, and values nearly all of us share. 
By JaneHWB on 02/20/2009 at 4:49:19
Re: Wish upon a czar
Thanks for the article. I've long thought that Paul Krugman would be the ideal person to be in charge of rehabilitating our economy. Surely President Obama is aware of Mr. Krugman's formidable talents? Let's hope he sees the light and drafts this Nobel Prize winner into public service.
By skylolo99 on 02/23/2009 at 3:19:12

ARTICLES BY STEVEN STARK
Share this entry with Delicious
  •   MEN PLUS MONEY EQUALS MESS  |  May 14, 2009
    The financial crisis is a man-made problem. And it might not have occurred if we had listened to women.
  •   ARLEN THE FAMILY  |  May 11, 2009
    Will Specter the Defector trigger a Democratic domination, or is his jump the sign of a growing moderate revolution?
  •   SPARE CHANGE?  |  April 28, 2009
    At the 100-day mark, Barack Obama still doesn't have a clear mandate for sweeping reforms
  •   COURTHOUSE MARRIAGE  |  April 21, 2009
    The gay-rights movement took a chance on fighting for the right to wed. It's finally paying off.
  •   MAN BITES NEWSPAPER  |  April 19, 2009
    The genesis of the newspaper problems can be traced to Richard Nixon.

 See all articles by: STEVEN STARK

MOST POPULAR
RSS Feed of for the most popular articles
 Most Viewed   Most Emailed 



  |  Sign In  |  Register
 
thePhoenix.com:
Phoenix Media/Communications Group:
TODAY'S FEATURED ADVERTISERS
Copyright © 2009 The Phoenix Media/Communications Group