A Good Idea From France: A New Type of Debate
Devoted readers of this blog have already read
some of the ways in which French politics differs from its American counterpart. Late last week, the French presidential election campaign offered another twist that Americans may want to borrow.
Facing a tough opponent in the runoff, socialist candidate
Segolene Royal engaged in a debate with the man who had finished third and had been squeezed out of that runoff
-- Francois Bayrou. Call it desperation perhaps, but after only one
debate in the current American campaign under the same old staged
rules, one longs for a little variety. Something along this line could
provide it.
Forget about the candidates debating
one another: We already have enough of that. But what if some agreed to
appear with other figures? It might open things up. By almost any
account, the most informative and best debate of the last fifteen years
occurred when H. Ross Perot and Al Gore appeared jointly on the Larry
King show in 1993 to discuss NAFTA.
Readers are free to suggest possibilities. Here are two to get things started:

BILL VS. HILLARY: You could put this on pay per view and it would draw an audience.
and
MIKE GRAVEL VS.
MIKE GRAVEL 
Readers are invited to suggest other possibilities.