My buddy Dan Kennedy dimisses this NY Times Q-and-A with "Caroline Kennedy and her staff" (the paper's phrase) as "crapola," and argues that the Times shouldn't have run it.
His "crapola" assessment is dead on. But to my mind, that's exactly why the Times did the right thing in printing the interview. By providing the (softball) questions directed to Kennedy and the answers provided by her surrogates, the paper drives home the point that Kennedy wasn't capable of fielding the queries herself--to damning effect. Consider this excerpt:
Q. Do you support any federal or state restrictions on gun ownership? If so, which ones?A. Caroline Kennedy is a strong supporter of gun control. She supports New York City’s and New York State’s gun control laws. On the federal level, she support the Brady Law, and other measures to keep guns out of the hands of minors and criminals.Q. Do you believe that an undivided Jerusalem must be the national capital of the State of Israel?A. Yes, Caroline believes that an undivided Jerusalem must be the national capital of the State of Israel.Q. Do you support the auto industry bailout package passed by the House of Representatives earlier this month?A. Yes, Caroline supports the auto industry bailout package passed by the House of Representatives earlier this month.
And this woman wants to be a U.S. senator?!?