Read it for free while you can, because the New York Times Co. today announced that, starting next year, you'll have to pay for nytimes.com after reading a certain number of articles in a given month.
An email from Times Co. honchos Arthur Sulzberger Jr. and Janet Robinson follows. Note that the Times apparently doesn't plan to combine this metered approach with a broader, Steve Brill-style consoritum. (Also, print readers will apparently be able to get all web content for free once the metered approach is implemented, which is as it should be.)
Of all the web sites out there, nytimes.com is the one I'd be most willing to pay for. Not sure how much I'd fork over, but $10 a month seems like a good round number.
Today we are announcing that we will be introducing a paid model for NYTimes.com at the beginning of 2011. As you will see in the press release,we have chosen a metered approach that will offer users free access to a set number of articles per month and then charge users once they exceedthat number.The metered model implementation is an integral part of our comprehensive plan for enhancing NYTimes.com. In 2010 we will continue initiatives suchas Times Open, Times Topics and our work to develop more active communities and more fully integrate the real-time Web. We will continue to develop newonline products and offerings as part of our effort to enhance the user experience for our readers and advertisers. Our strategy is to build the metered model while we remain focused on making NYTimes.com more compelling, interactive and entertaining, providingmany more reasons for online audiences to visit our site and stay longer. In the weeks ahead, we will be adding resources to achieve these criticallyimportant goals.Since NYTimes.com is, by a variety of standards, one of the world’s most popular and successful news Web sites, why are we changing our model atall?We are doing so because we believe that a second revenue stream will be an important part of our future. While digital advertising will continue to bethe major contributor to our success on the Web, we expect that online subscription revenue will improve our ability to grow an important part ofthis business.Fundamentally, this is an important step in our effort to support The New York Times’s high-quality, professional journalism. Our readers know thatThe Times brings them the most authoritative news and opinion to be found anywhere. We believe that they are willing to pay for it online, just asthey are already paying a significant price for it in print.We greatly appreciate this loyalty and dedication to what we have to offer. Since the metered model infrastructure is completed, New York Times homedelivery print subscribers will continue to have free access to NYTimes.com.We also selected the metered model because it offers a number of important virtues from a financial and growth perspective. It allows NYTimes.com toremain a vibrant part of the search-driven Web, which has proven to be an integral reason for why we have become an industry leader in displayadvertising. This flexibility enables us to create a proper ratio between free and paid content and to aggressively build on our very successfuldigital advertising business.As you have already seen over the past few days, there are those who think that such an action is critical to our future success and those who see itas a serious mistake. This comes as no surprise. We know from long experience that significant change invariably breeds controversy; thatthere will be an ongoing public conversation about what we are doing, and we expect that many of the comments will prove to be helpful.We know these arguments well because our metered model decision is a product of months of vigorous analysis and debate. There was much we wantedto learn and know. We wanted to get a far better sense of NYTimes.com’s potential over the next decade. We also wanted to understand where the Webmay be heading and how new technologies will affect customer online usage. We believed that only by carefully pursuing these and other importantissues could we arrive at the best possible answer.Ultimately, we recognize that the success of our ideas will be judged by how well we execute this effort in the months to come. That is why we arewaiting until 2011 to introduce this new system. To pursue this new approach requires that we utilize the full energy and intellect of all ofyou. All that work begins today. As we said earlier, our goal is to create the best possible user experience, integrating many of our customermanagement systems throughout the Company. It will take time to get this right.Moving with appropriate care will enhance our ability to embrace an array of promising opportunities that are at our doorstep. As we look ahead, wesee a broad range of end-user devices coming to market that will provide even more mobility, connectivity, rich media experiences and a higherdegree of application value, and our pricing plans and policies must reflect this vision.There has also been much speculation in the media and elsewhere abou whether The Times will join a consortium as part of the metered modelimplementation plan. At this stage, our plan is to introduce the metered model as a stand-alone product. At the same time, we continue to discussalternatives with a broad range of prospective collaborators with regard to bundled offers and other aggregation opportunities.We will provide additional details about our plan as we get closer to launch.The creation of a metered model for NYTimes.com is part of a long evolution to expand our presence on the Web and exploit new mobile and socialnetworking vehicles. We are able to take this step today because of the scale and success that we have developed over the past 15 years.NYTimes.com is now widely recognized as the gold standard in online news and information. This decision is a natural next step and we hope that youwill be as excited as we are to take on this new opportunity.To read the press release go to www.nytco.com.Arthur and Janet